Avatar is fast becoming one of
the most popular moneymakers out of Hollywood, combining high tech
and full 3D effects with a popular theme in human evolution.
I saw it with my 8 year-old and,
naturally, he asked me what it was all about. He loved the animation
and the fast-paced drama and conflict. But he wondered aloud about
its meaning, which made me think about it too.
Avatar isn't just a movie. It's
about the conflict inside humanity, one that has been repeated over
and over again throughout human history.
A more technically advanced
civilization - not more intelligent - advances on another
civilization to occupy its lands, dominate or enslave its people and
rape its natural resources.
Where have I heard that story
before? African slave trading. Palestine. The deep recesses of the
Amazon and Guatemalan jungles. The "West" neck deep in Middle
East oil. The Dutch dancing in diamond-rich South Africa. Maybe one
might view it as a euphemism for the conflict in Iraq, too, where
oil-driven desires started an unnecessary war?
It has, naturally, evoked a lot
of commentary in wide disparity and diversity. Some minority writers
insist that it is a ridiculous notion to suggest that a White Man -
one that is paraplegic at that -- would enter a native environment
and help save the natives from the White Man's invading race.
One writer called it "White
guilt fantasy." I think the writer might be right.
I saw it in my own context as an
American and as a Palestinian. A redacted saga what might have
happened to Native American Indians. The ultimate reverse
Thanksgiving where the "pilgrims," instead of being embraced by
the "Indians," were defeated and thrown out of this already
populated and cultured country.
Maybe it might even be an epic
metaphor of the drama still playing out in Palestine more than six
decades later with one group trying to dominate the other over a
resource, land.
I am sure that depending on your
race and cultural experience, the meaning was different. Maybe that
is why the James Cameron film has become so popular. It's not just
the amazing special effects, or even the powerful narrative of the
film itself.
In America, I know Hollywood has
become the public's legal narcotic, an hallucinogen that off-sets
the reality of the world around us. We watch TV programs like 24 to
empower our need to believe we are winning the "war on terrorism"
and to reinforce the idea that the terrorists are not us, but those
olive skinned Muslims.
But unlike all of the mainstream
schlock in Hollywood that play to the prejudices, emotions and fears
of its audiences - casting the enemy as the foreigner and mainly
Middle Easterners as "the terrorists" - Avatar has masterfully
given some hope, others guilt and even a few a reason to rethink our
history's propaganda.
I loved the film. But then, I've
always sympathized with the underdog, cheering the Mohicans in James
Fenmore Cooper's novel, feeling a little less guilty
over Little Big Horn and enjoying gambling and losing my cash more at
an "Indian Casino" than one owned by "the man."
I can't
get enough of the sensation of sometimes watching those cast as "the
lesser civilized" beat the bejesus out of the "more advanced"
invading "civilization.
So I will
probably go back and watch Avatar one more time.
"Have no
fear; Underdog is here," is a chant I love from one of my favorite
childhood cartoons.
Posted
at
6 Jan 2010 6:35 AM
by